Properties: hard, brittle, high mp and bp, often water soluble, electrolytes in solution or melt, usually crystalline. All of this suggests large bond energies.
Necessary conditions for an ionic compound: cation (implies neutral species has a low IP) and anion (implies neutral has a high EA)
We develop a theory of ionic bonding using simple electrostatics. Assume
that the ions behave as point charges (i.e., the ions have no volume).
Then build a lattice from condensation of gas phase ions and use Coulomb's
law to calculate the energy.
Ion Pair
q+, q- are the ionic charges in coulombs
r is the distance between ions in meters
0 is the permittivity of free space
Ion square
Since (in this example) q+=-q-
ion cube
Continue this over the entire lattice to give:
N0 = Avogadro’s number
Z+, Z- are the ionic charges in units of e (i.e., +1, +2, -1, -2, etc.)
r is the interionic distance
M is called the Madelung constant.
M depends solely on geometry, i.e., the kind of lattice but the internuclear
distances are factored out. Madelung constants are tabulated for all the
common lattice types.
ECoul is negative (all terms are positive except Z-), i.e., the bonding is favorable. In fact, too favorable: the most stable situation is when r = 0.
Why? Initial point charge assumption does not allow for nuclear-nuclear repulsion at close distances.
Correct this empirically: add a term that is repulsive at small r but negligible at larger distances. This means either an exponential term or a 1/rn term with large n.
Born repulsion:
n is known as the Born exponent, B is an arbitrary constant
The lattice energy becomes
Need to find two new quantities: B and n.
Evaluate B at equilbrium because
(r0 is the equilibrium internuclear distance measured experimentally)
So, at r = r0
To find n, we must move away from the equilibrium position. This means
compressing the sample, i.e. measure the compressibility,
:
Sample calculation for NaCl:
= 8.854×10-12 SI units
e = 1.602×10–19 coulombs
M = 1.74756 (NaCl structure)
d = 5.628×10-10 m giving r0 = 2.814×10–10 m
= 4.18×10–11 SI
n is found by
This compares to 769.4 kJ/mole experimental (2.4% error)
lattice energies are thermodynamically negative but reported as positive values (like EA)